address:
Service points are available in Shenzhen, Hong Kong, Japan, Boten, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and the United States.
microsoft
zj2017122
Phone:
13902458366
For business inquiries or to obtain the latest industry quotes, please scan the QR code or add the WeChat ID below. We will provide you with one-on-one exclusive service.

Can I still get Canadian citizenship if I give birth in Canada?
In this age of information explosion and even a bit of "anxiety-inducing traffic", if you're reading this, I can probably guess how you're feeling right now-That stone hangs in the air all the time.
Maybe you've just finished scrolling through the Little Red Book and saw someone say "Canadian maternity policy is about to change, as soon as the Conservatives get into power, they're going to abolish citizenship by landing";
Perhaps you have just listened to the presentation of an untrustworthy agent, and the other party scares you that "it will be closed soon", while selling the so-called "internal quota" and "special channels".
Let's open up:A child born in Canada will still have Canadian citizenship on the ground!
I've been in the business of overseas child birth for almost ten years: from helping people order takeout and running hospitals at the Vancouver Moon Center, to working as an independent birth policy advisor, I've personally sent countless "Canadian babies" back to China. I know what you are afraid of:
I'm afraid I've spent two or three hundred thousand dollars.
Fly over there with a big belly.
As a result of an overnight change in policy.
The child didn't get his identity, and he himself was denied a visa and blackmailed.
This article is written for moms and dads who want to have a baby in Canada and be able to give their baby a Canadian identity.
Whether you want to give your child an additional Canadian citizenship, save a way for future education, or simply want to have an additional "lifeboat", I will tell you as thoroughly as possible what I have seen, heard, and stepped into on the front line over the years - in the 2025 in the context of existing laws and policies, what is the Canadian birth really all about.
Who is this article especially for?
I'll try not to talk crap and will put:
Latest policy developments,
The logic behind the Citizenship Act,
as well as real-life cases I've come across.
It's all crumbled up into a basis for judgment that you can understand. After reading this, you at least won't have to rummage around piecing together information.
If you are now short of time, first read this "condensed judgment table", it can help you quickly determine: this road, generally worth it to continue to study.
Note: The following is a comprehensive judgment based on 2025 public information, real project offers and past experience, and does not constitute legal advice or immigration advice, the specific circumstances still need to be combined with your own conditions and the latest official policy at the time.
| Core issues | 2025 status quo approximation | A short review (my attitude) |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition of nationality | General stabilization in the framework of the current Citizenship Act | As long as the baby is born on Canadian soil and the parents are not diplomatically immune, he or she will generally be recognized as a Canadian citizen. Changing the law is not a matter of words. |
| policy risk | Medium-low | There are controversial voices in society, and the Conservative Party has also made comments on "tightening", but from the perspective of the legislative process, the probability of a sudden "overnight closure" within one to three years is very low, and even if adjustments are made in the future, they will not be made retrospectively. |
| Parenthood | Basic legal "decoupling" from the nationality of the baby. | You are on a tourist visa, a school visa, a work visa, or even if your status has expired, as long as the person is physically in Canada, the result of the child's nationality at birth is the same. Identity and citizenship are two systems. |
| dependent immigrant | Ultra-long term option | There is no such channel as "getting a Maple Leaf Card immediately after the birth of a child". Usually it is possible to reunite the parents only when the child reaches adulthood and has a stable income. It can be seen as an option after 18 years. |
| total cost | Approx. 250,000-500,000 RMB (wide range) | The medical care itself is not the most expensive, what really separates the difference is the length of stay, standard of accommodation, monthly services and whether or not you have insurance. |
| greatest difficulty | Visa and Entry Compliance and Communication | Getting nationality is not legally complicated, but the hard part is: how to make the visa officer and customs believe that you are here to pay for your own expenses, not to gather welfare by using the "honest visa + honest entry" method. |
This is the first question that comes to mind for almost any family planning to have a child in Canada.
I'll start by giving the short answer under current law in 2025:
Within the framework of the Canadian Citizenship Act currently in force, as long as the baby is in theBirth in Canadian territory/airspace/territorial seaand that the parents are not special persons enjoying diplomatic immunity.
Legally, one is usually recognized directly as a Canadian citizen.
There's no "must have a maple card", "must be legal", "must have paid taxes for years" - -It's "place of birth", not parentage.
This is not an unspoken rule or a "loophole", but one of the basic systems written in the law.
But I also understand very well that at the 2025 point, you're not worried about "is it going to work now", you're worried about it:
So we're going to take this next step and flesh it out a little bit from the dimensions of legal logic and political reality.
There are two broad sets of logic in the way nationality is given internationally:
In countries like China, Japan and Germany, it is mainly about the "blood":
If your parents are Chinese, you have Chinese citizenship, it's not that important where you were born.
Canada (and the United States), on the other hand, are typically"Territorialist States"The
In the bluntest terms:
"As long as this child is born on this Canadian soil, Canada recognizes him/her in principle as one of its own."
This rule is clearly stated in section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act.
The article itself has legal language, but translated into human language that we can understand is:
"A person born in Canada is generally considered a Canadian citizen (except in cases of diplomatic immunity)."
It's not in the law:
"Parents must hold PR or citizenship".
Nor does it say "must have a tax record" or "must be legally present".
So, when someone scares you by saying "no passports for doubly non-permanent residents" and "no citizenship", you can calm down: unless the Citizenship Act is formally amended and comes into force after the third reading in the future, the existing rules will remain in force.
For the sake of rigor, we have to make that very small probability exception clear.
If you or your spouse fall into one of the categories below and neither is a Canadian citizen or permanent resident:
Under current law, then, a child born in Canada in such circumstances does not usually automatically acquire Canadian citizenship.
The reason is also simple: these persons enjoy diplomatic immunity and are considered by law to be "not subject exclusively to Canadian jurisdiction", so their children are not subject to the normal rules of birthright citizenship.
But let's be honest, there is a huge probability that you, who are reading this article, do not fall into this category.
The vast majority of families with tourist visas, school visas, work visas, or whose status has expired but are still in Canada are not included in this exception.
Many families are torn between having a baby in the U.S. and having a baby in Canada, so what is the difference between the two countries?
Same point:
Differences: mainly in the "difficulty of reforming the law" and the "tax system".
🇺🇸 United States
🇨🇦 Canada
That's why:
In terms of long-term stability, it is virtually impossible for U.S. birthright citizenship to be revoked overnight;
In terms of realpolitik possibilities, there are more voices discussing "tightening" in Canada, but the process will be very slow to get off the ground, and there will be a lot of checks and balances in the courts and in public opinion in the middle of the process.
Many moms have similar questions when they have their first consultation:
"Are we drilling?"
"What if one day the government says they won't issue passports?"
Let's start with a centering word:
"Going to Canada to have a child is not exploiting a loophole under the current law, it's going down the road that's written in black and white."
One of the most central provisions of the Citizenship Act can basically be summarized in one sentence:
"A person born in Canada will generally be considered a Canadian citizen (except for children of persons with diplomatic immunity)."
Additional conditions such as parental status, length of residence, tax records, etc. are usually not added.
It is also this principle of "land, not people" that has made birthright citizenship a very important institutional cornerstone of this land.
Of course, the laws of any country may be adjusted; but until they are adjusted, the existing law is the basis for realistic operation.
In order to understand "content", we can compare two lines of thought:
For the average family:
"Descentism" is more like inheriting a nationality from one's parents;
"Territorialism" is more like being given a nationality by the State on its own initiative because of one's place of birth.
This also means that, as long as the current system is in place, the right to citizenship by birthplace is highly stable and "inalienable".
You may have seen it pop up in news headlines in the last year or two:
"Canada to amend Citizenship Act"
"Bill C-71" etc.
Many agents even use this as a scare tactic, saying that "nationality will be tightened".
In fact, according to the current public information, the core direction of Bill C-71 is to fix the problems caused by the "first generation limitation", roughly:
In other words:
Bill C-71 deals primarily with the issue of "Canadians giving birth overseas" rather than "foreigners giving birth in Canada".
Trend-wise, this is a direction of expanding and equalizing the right to nationality, not tightening it.
Of course, the specific content of the bill, the implementation of the rules may continue to adjust over time, and ultimately to the Canadian government's latest official announcement of the text shall prevail, this point in the article also need to remind readers.
It is true that there has been an ongoing controversy within Canadian society regarding "Birth Tourism":
But there is still a long way to go between that and actually "changing the law":
Therefore, by 2025, the discussion on "abolishing the nationality of non-permanent residents on the ground" will be very hot in the court of public opinion, but at the legislative level, it will basically remain at the stage of "proposals and statements".
That's why, we say:
For families already planning or in the process of pregnancy, the more realistic variables are often visa policies and entry criteria, rather than the "instantaneous disappearance" of nationality itself.
It is these two issues that many families get most confused about:
"The baby is Canadian now, will I get the benefit of the doubt?"
"I don't have a legal status, will I drag my child down?"
Stick that in your head for now:
Under the current system in Canada, there is one system for the nationality of babies and another for parenthood. The two are largely decoupled legally.
Taken together with the preceding, we can give this summary (based on the 2025 current law) with some rigor:
Babies born in Canada are usually legally recognized directly as Canadian citizens, as long as the parents are not part of a special group of people who enjoy diplomatic immunity.
That sentence covers it:
Many families will ask:
"So what specifically does the baby get more than that dark blue passport for all the money I've spent?"
There are a couple of broad lines to look at:
Here we directly use the "FAQ form" to take care of the search and the readers:
Q: Can doubly non-non-permanent parents rely on their babies and get a Canadian Maple Leaf Card (PR) quickly within a few years?
A: Not under the current policy.
Explain the general rules as they stand now (simplified version):
Therefore, for most families, this "dependent immigrant card" is more like an option for 15 to 20 years, rather than a "benefit that can be cashed in immediately".
Simple and brutal conclusion:
The impact on the baby's citizenship outcome is very limited, and the impact on the parents' own future visa records and immigration opportunities is significant.
On the point of the nationality of the child:
It doesn't matter if you have a tourist visa, a school visa, a work visa, or a visa that has expired, the child's place of birth is in Canada → citizenship is generally recognized under the same rules.
On the line of parental future:
With an Honest Visa + Honest Entry + Full Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenses, there is usually no negative record for future visits to Canada;
If you intentionally conceal the "purpose of giving birth" at the visa stage or upon entry into the country, or refuse to pay the medical fees after giving birth, you are likely to be regarded as a "good faith problem" and a "public burden risk" when applying for a visa or entry into the country in the future, leading to frequent refusals. "This may result in frequent refusals.
Having said that about Canada, let's go back to the more troubling, but more grounded, side of the equation - the Chinese perspective.
Many moms and dads will have two opposite concerns:
"We don't have foreign status, and if our children are born in Canada, will they be treated as foreigners by China?"
"When a child gets a Canadian passport, does China 'disown' him?"
Behind this is in fact a typical problem of "conflict of nationality".
First of all, I would like to emphasize that the following operational experience mainly comes from the current first-tier cities and the summary of real family cases, the specific practices of different cities and different police stations/exit/entry windows may vary, and ultimately, the latest caliber of the local official shall prevail.
The key is this article - article 5 of the Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China - which can be reduced to a two-sentence "formula":
For the vast majority of "doubly non-permanent resident families" who come to Canada to have children:
You do not have a Canadian Maple Leaf Card and have not settled there permanently;
The child acquired Canadian citizenship under Canadian law;
On the Chinese side, in most cases, they will still be considered Chinese citizens.
That is, in the actual implementation environment of 2025, your child is likely to be in an"Legally China recognizes it, and so does Canada."The state of the art.
In practice, there are three main routes for return and entry/exit (the following is only a summary of common practice):
1. Canadian passport + Chinese travel authorization (mainstream, recommended model)
2. Canadian passport + Chinese visa (generally not recommended, unless the family has planned thoroughly for "alien status")
3. Attempts to apply for a Chinese passport (very difficult in most cases and a policy risk)
Overall, most families who want their children to complete their basic education in China while retaining international access for the future choose the dual-track program of "Canadian Passport + Chinese Travel Permit".
Travel permits are usually valid for two years, which makes many parents nervous: "Do we have to fly out every two years and toss the kids to change their permits?"
In fact, this is generally the case:
So what if your travel permit has expired but you suddenly want to take your child out of the country?
You can go to the immigration office where your household registration is located and apply for a copy of the"One-time Entry and Exit Permit"This document is usually valid for a short period of time for a single round trip; after leaving the country, a new travel permit can be obtained at a Chinese embassy or consulate outside the country, and the new document can be used to return to China.
Therefore, there is no need to "renew the license" specifically for the child to go abroad frequently, you can really have travel plans and then deal with it together.
This is one of the most sensitive and rumor-wrapped issues.
Currently common in first-tier cities (e.g. Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen):
Police stations are usually aware of such cases where the child was born abroad and may hold a passport from abroad; in many places, a form similar to the "Declaration of Nationality Status" is issued, asking parents to declare that "the child has Chinese nationality only".
Will the passport be taken away?
In many real-life cases, police stations will not take away or cut the corners of Canadian passports because they are in charge of household registration and do not directly manage foreign passports; in some places, they may make a note in the system that the child had a foreign nationality or was born abroad.
In a few second- and third-tier cities or at individual windows, it is indeed possible to encounter the statement that "it is required to cancel foreign nationality before applying for a hukou", at which point:
Generally speaking, in terms of actual operation, there is a gray area in many regions where "applying for a hukou + retaining a Canadian passport" is compatible. It is just that the practice varies from place to place, so be sure to refer to the latest caliber of the local public security and immigration departments.
This is a big pitfall that many families find out about later in life.
Typical situation:
The Canadian birth certificate says David Zhang;
When I went back to China, I wrote Zhang Wei in my household registration.
In the long run, this may cause trouble when applying to study abroad, transferring property, inheriting property, or even emigrating.
Recommended Practice:
After looking at the system and the documents, let's pull the whole process into a timeline so you know roughly what to prepare for each step.
In 2025, Canadian visa approvals will remain rigorous and the system's cross-checking capabilities will grow.
I usually only suggest one path for families who are planning to go for a baby:Honest visa + sufficient proof of ability to pay for your own expenses.
In the visa interpretation letter, the logical closure can be constructed in this way:
Canadian law does not prohibit foreigners from paying for their own medical care, the key is to convince the visa officer that you will not be "taking advantage of free benefits" or "hacking in Canada".
After getting the visa, you get off the plane in Vancouver (YVR) and Toronto (YYZ) and are confronted with questioning by the CBSA (Border Services Agency).
The general dialog style could look like this (example only):
Q: What are you doing in Canada?
A: Traveling and visiting family while completing labor and delivery here at your own expense.
Q: Is the cost enough?
A: Here is our proof of funds, enough to cover full medical expenses and cost of living, and will not apply for public benefits.
Q: Will you stay and not go after giving birth?
A: Our work and family are in China, and we will return to China as planned after our child is born and documents are issued.
There are only two points of emphasis:
It is recommended that you always check with the specific hospital or agency for the latest prices and charges before making a decision, and do not rely entirely on old experiences on the internet.
After the baby is born, the "documentation war" begins. The general process is as follows:
It is recommended that you make a checklist in advance and follow it after production to avoid omissions.
Many parents are doing the math in their minds the moment they pay, "Is this trip worth it?"
From a long-term perspective, the value of Canadian citizenship falls along three main lines: education, development pathways, and tax and mobility.
The focus is not on "whether or not you can go to a prestigious school," but rather:
Nowadays, international students, almost all of them have to go:
Study Abroad → Graduate Worker Visa (PGWP) → Saving Work Experience → Splitting Express Entry Score → Queuing for Invitation
Any failure in this path could force them to "pack up and go home".
Children who are Canadian citizens, on the other hand, are not on that path at all:
From the perspective of passport use: Canadian passports are currently visa-free or visa-on-arrival for most developed countries, making travel extremely convenient; in the North American region, more flexible access to the United States for work is possible through TN visas, for example.
A key point from a tax perspective is:Canada's tax system is based on "tax residency" and not on "nationality" per se.
That is to say: if the child lives in China for a long time after adulthood and does not constitute a tax resident of Canada, generally does not involve the problem of paying taxes to Canada; this point is significantly different from the U.S. system of "Citizenship Global Taxation", which is one of the reasons why many families prefer to "Canadian children "This is one of the reasons why many families prefer to have children in Canada.
Many families are in a state of "de facto dual citizenship" when the children are minors;
But children will always grow up and face choices in the future including:
Without expanding on all the extremes, a few points of principle will be emphasized:
Most of the professions that really require children to make an "either/or" choice in adulthood are those that involve strong single-nationality requirements, such as political trials, civil service, or the military.
If the situation of "renouncing one's nationality" does arise in the future, the procedure is usually not complicated, but the key is to realize that it is an irreversible choice and to make a full assessment before making a decision.
This is the "sword of Damocles" hanging over all families.
Looking at the political environment in 2025:
But at the level of real legislation and implementation, the road is neither fast nor easy.
Roughly what can be expected:
Even if there is a tightening direction in the future, the odds are that it will be:
Therefore, for families who are already pregnant, or plan to complete the program in 1-3 years:
The more real risk lies in the tightening of visa processing and more detailed questioning at entry rather than the "sudden invalidation" of a child's nationality.
This last paragraph is more of a "friendly conversation" with you.
The main exception under the current law is:
One or both parents are diplomats or members of a specified international organization with diplomatic immunity and neither parent is a Canadian citizen or PR.
Families with ordinary tourist visas, school visas, work visas, or even expired status are generally excluded from this exception.
Looking at actual cases:
Passports can mostly still be applied for as normal in the program;
However, hospitals and collection agencies have the right to collect debts, and delinquent fees may enter the credit system and affect parents' future visa or entry applications;
In serious cases, it may be difficult for parents to regain their visas for many years.
In any case, it is not advisable to go into this with a "renegade" mentality, which is not the same thing as "does the child get citizenship or not", but it can be very detrimental to your and your child's future options.
There is currently no such shortcut;
The family reunification category of immigration is usually not operable until the children have reached adulthood, have a stable income, and meet the sponsorship requirements.
Airlines usually have requirements on the week of pregnancy, e.g. a doctor's certificate is required after 32 weeks and may refuse to carry passengers after 36 weeks, depending on the airline's terms and conditions;
Customs is more interested in: whether you are honest about the purpose, whether you have enough money to pay for yourself, and whether you have a clear plan for your return trip.
As long as you are medically cleared to fly, have sufficient information, and are honest, you will not normally be refused entry because of a "big belly".
In the light of modern principles of the rule of law, significant changes in rights will normally be grandfathered;
In other words, once a baby has acquired citizenship under the current law, even if the system is adjusted in the future, it will generally be protected through "grandfather clauses" and other forms of protection.
Having a child in Canada is not a "pay today, turn tomorrow" lottery.
More accurately, it's a copy:
Spreading out risk, time costs, and uncertainty in household decisions;
It is a long-term configuration that buys in advance the "educational path, international mobility, and identity options" for the next few decades.
In the not-so-calm world of 2025, preparing your child with an extra identity is a bit like putting an extra lifeboat at sea - the
You'll probably never use it in your life.
But you know that even if one day the storm is really rough, the child can have more and better options.
Above, are all for a family that can normally give birth to all the interpretation of the family, and for those who are older, or can not have children and want to have a child family, Canadian surrogacy from the baby, but also the same can get Canadian citizenship, the specific surrogacy strategy can be referred to:2025 Canadian Surrogacy Laws, Prices ExplainedThe article.